Specification:
*Toxo: A statistical comparison for IgM was made between the results yielding a
clinical relative sensitivity: 98.2%, relative specificity: 99.2%, overall agreement: 98.9%. A statistical comparison for IgG was made between the results yielding a clinical relative sensitivity: 98.3%, relative specificity: 99.6%, overall agreement: 99.2%.
*Rubella: A statistical comparison for IgM was made between the results yielding a
clinical relative sensitivity: 96.8%, relative specificity: 98.0%, overall agreement: 97.6%. A statistical comparison for IgG was made between the results yielding a clinical relative sensitivity: 97.4%, relative specificity: 98.5%, overall agreement: 98.1%.
*CMV: A statistical comparison for IgM was made between the results yielding a
clinical relative sensitivity: 96.7%, relative specificity: 98.3%, overall agreement: 97.7%. A statistical comparison for IgG was made between the results yielding a clinical relative sensitivity: 97.4%, relative specificity: 98.2%, overall agreement: 97.9%.
*HSV1/2: A statistical comparison for IgM was made between the results yielding a
clinical relative sensitivity: 97.8%, relative specificity: 98.9%, overall agreement: 98.5%. A statistical comparison for IgG was made between the results yielding a clinical relative sensitivity: 97.7%, relative specificity: 98.3%, overall agreement: 98.1%.